Comments on: XBox 360 Graphics Better Than PS3?

By: emeka

emeka — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:58:59 +0000

i certainly agree that xbox360 is better

By: Guilherme

Guilherme — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:04:16 +0000

XBOX

By: g getta

g getta — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:37:37 +0000

ps3 beasts xbox like no tommorow

By: Aaron

Aaron — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 23:54:25 +0000

Not baggin either way, but i just purchased my ps3 and have been a little dissapointed. It does not blow away my 360 like i had thought. I feel some games actually have poorer textures and dont run as well. At least I have teh blu ray player though. I’m still thinking about ditching the ps3 though.

By: Die hard Microsoft

Die hard Microsoft — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:56:23 +0000

Yea I agree it’s been out for this long and still it’s inferior to 360. Now I can say microsoft are money hungry vampires but hey I go for graphics and gameplay. And from my years of gaming I can say 360 twerks out more visuals and details than that of the ps3. Look at every game comparison online, Hell by both and compare them xbox wins everytime much higher fps and xbox live rocks ass big time. Except for that damn fee!! I don’t understand why this brand new system has lower graphics than this system that’s been out this damn long I mean what the hell was sony doing all these years. Blu ray come on man you rather have a game system with hd same damn thing as blu ray except blu ray holds more space or a ps3 with inferior washed out graphics I’m not sayig their bad but Remember people 360 was born of the ultimate gaming system the computer it has computer hardware inside while sony has jap hardware some shit they just through together and now they complain that its too complicated to program.Well why would you make it that way thats no excuss for inferior graphics.

By: Subnoize Soulja 420

Subnoize Soulja 420 — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:15:40 +0000

The Ps3 Whomps The Xbox 3Shitty. Thats funny piece of shit Microsoft made. They should stick to OS.

By: Lol

Lol — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:05:02 +0000

And yes I know there will be lots of games for consoles ONLY but that doesn’t mean there wont be emulators. Even if they are slow and full of bugs, they are bound to be useable and playable.

Also look at Dynasty Warriors 6, they even made a PC version for it, I pitty consoles, but I do love playing some of the games, however PC is superior.

ha.. I bought PC into the war.

By: Lol

Lol — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:58:45 +0000

Forgot to mention a decent Gaming PC would last you years to come, hell my AMD mobile4 with no graphic card could run WoW and Guild Wars with no lag. And I only recently spent $700 for a QuadCore Gamer PC, which will last me for like 10~15 more years

By: Lol

Lol — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:52:07 +0000

@ walt, just because PS3 out sold 360 doesn’t make it better.

I bet 70% of the people who bought PS3 are trend-whoring idiots who just buy it because “omg its expencive, must be good and its new from Sony! Everyones for it zomgz mast hab.”

and FYI 360 dont be burried by PS3 or even for future release from Sony. It will only be burried when Microsoft releases their new console system or discontinued making consoles. Game Comapnies will continue to make games for every New console there is.

Also, PC > consoles why spend hundrends of dollars buying a new console every release? let alone that 80% of everyone who owns a console BUYs the games which makes you spend even more.

By: Sean Fallon

Sean Fallon — Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:42:27 +0000

Jesus Christ dudes, this post is referring to a Gamespot test from November…of 2006. It doesn’t mean shit anymore. Always check the dates.