<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seeing The Stars With A Rocket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nerdapproved.com/misc-weirdness/seeing-the-stars-with-a-rocket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nerdapproved.com/misc-weirdness/seeing-the-stars-with-a-rocket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Paquette</title>
		<link>http://nerdapproved.com/misc-weirdness/seeing-the-stars-with-a-rocket/comment-page-1/#comment-80990</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Paquette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nerdapproved.com/?p=9675#comment-80990</guid>
		<description>Being an amateur astronomer with over 20 years of experience, I can tell you that this is bad advertizing. Such a small instrument can not reasonably reach 375x magnification: at most MAYBE 180x, but the image will be fuzzy at best -- beyond that, it is bigger, yes, but nothing but a blur.

For just a few dollars more, people can get a serious telescope, and I would recommend brands such as SkyWatcher, Celestron or Meade.

Note, however, that having a telescope is useless if you don&#039;t know what to point it at: so the best thing for a beginner is really a BOOK!

Good night,
Pierre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being an amateur astronomer with over 20 years of experience, I can tell you that this is bad advertizing. Such a small instrument can not reasonably reach 375x magnification: at most MAYBE 180x, but the image will be fuzzy at best &#8212; beyond that, it is bigger, yes, but nothing but a blur.</p>
<p>For just a few dollars more, people can get a serious telescope, and I would recommend brands such as SkyWatcher, Celestron or Meade.</p>
<p>Note, however, that having a telescope is useless if you don&#8217;t know what to point it at: so the best thing for a beginner is really a BOOK!</p>
<p>Good night,<br />
Pierre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.216 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: nerdapproved.com @ 2012-02-13 05:59:25 -->
