Lego Makes “Friends” Line For Girls [Toys]

by Amy Ratcliffe on December 16, 2011

in Misc. Nerdiness,News,Toys

Dear girls of the world: You can finally enjoy Legos.

Those might not be the exact words Lego is using to promote their new Lego Friends line, but the message seems to be there. After studying the market and playtesting several options, they’ve decided to launch a new product aimed at girls aged five and above. The new sets include new figures designed specifically to appeal to girls. They’re a bit taller and curvier. Apparently, real Lego have curves.

Read more and see a minifig to ladyfig comparison photo after the break.

From Bloomberg BusinessWeek:

Then there are the lady figures. Twenty-nine mini-doll figures will be introduced in 2012, all 5 millimeters taller and curvier than the standard dwarf minifig. There are five main characters. Like American Girl Dolls, which are sold with their own book-length biographies, these five come with names and backstories. Their adventures have a backdrop: Heartlake City, which has a salon, a horse academy, a veterinary clinic, and a cafe. “We had nine nationalities on the team to make certain the underlying experience would work in many cultures,” says Nanna Ulrich Gudum, senior creative director.

The key difference between girls and the ladyfig and boys and the minifig was that many more girls projected themselves onto the ladyfig — she became an avatar. Boys tend to play with minifigs in the third person. “The girls needed a figure they could identify with, that looks like them,” says Rosario Costa, a Lego design director. The Lego team knew they were on to something when girls told them, “I want to shrink down and be there.”

Don’t get me wrong, I am not against getting more girls playing with Lego. It’s one of the most interactive toys available. Simply put, Lego is good for the brain. I know that some girls will be drawn in by the different style figures and colors, and that’s okay. They remind me of the hugely popular Polly Pocket toys. What I don’t understand is why Lego is changing its basic formula. To me, it feels like pandering (yeah, I went there) and I think it encourages separation of genders (and this is coming from a woman that’s a hopeless Lego addict).

There were Lego for girls before there were Lego friends; they were called just plain “Lego.” I didn’t play with sets growing up, but I had endless fun with just the bricks and a large baseplate to build my farms and cities upon. Even though I now have Star Wars and Harry Potter sets, but my stash is still mostly bricks. I adore Lego. I’ve converted my coffee table to a Lego surface. However, I have zero interest in these figures. I realize I’m hardly the target demographic age, but I think Lego should be square and clunky.  Adding curves is a pat on the head that says, “here, we’ve made these pretty so that you, little girl, will finally like them.”

 

Check out the Brick Blogger to see pictures of many of the new sets and lady figs.

(via The Mary Sue)

  • http://twitter.com/Spyrlshape Kelly Carman

    when my sister and i were younger back in the late 80s, there already was a set of Lego-like building sets made for girls.  i remember we had a mall and a dream house.  i can’t for the life of me remember the name of the company though

  • http://twitter.com/PhysicistLisa Lisa M

    i guess what i don’t understand the most is why this wouldn’t be a viable market strategy for both sexes. Toys have changed a lot. i think that more realistic looking minifigs and stories could have sold just as well for boys if they had marketed it to both, but now the ladyfigs are going to be “for girls” blah

  • http://twitter.com/onegirlgeek Jennifer

    I’m a girl, and I never had any problems playing with the original minifigs. Granted, I mostly played with LEGOs to build crazy things. I agree with Lisa M–why not have the same marketing strategy for boys? Without approaching the possibility that they’d identify better with more realistic looking LEGO people as well, it just feels like another case of gender stereotyping. I must say that the lab set looks pretty sweet, though. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/tara.petar Tara Renee Petar

    dont change the minifig design, just make more sets that would appeal to more girls like salons, beach house, mall, etc.

  • Laura Long

    We the cool nerdy girls have always liked them.  Now they’re just *adding* a new line that will appeal to the other girls. No big deal.

  • Pavlina G

    wow! I do like the flasks, bottles and tools though! Yes, those curvy Lego are dumb. My daughter loves regular Leogo

  • http://nakedhobo.com/blog Glenn Buettner

    I just like that they felt they had to make these because, 
    “The girls needed a figure they could identify with, that looks like them,”  So where is the figure I can identify with as a boy, one that looks like me, because I am not now, nor have I ever been bright yellow with cup hands.

  • Anonymous

    Why does there have to be lego for girls…. why can’t there just be lego… for everyone. This society needs to stop gender stereotyping, it is detrimental to our children’s individual preferences. Suddenly Suzy doesn’t feel like a girl because her favourite colour is green, not pink. Does this sound alarming to anyone else?

  • Anonymous

    seeing as how I’m not a girl I don’t know how valid my opinion is on the topic and while I don’t see anything wrong with trying to appeal to the female market I’m not sure how I feel about the curvy legos. Colors are whatever but you start throwing in curves and are you really even playing with Legos anymore?

  • http://www.meganfinley.com meganfinley

    Aw. I guess I never realized that Legos were for boys. Weird.

  • http://twitter.com/nerdygirl_om Dana

    They lost me as soon as I saw that the figures are reminiscent of Bratz dolls >_<

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jenna-Black/625407537 Jenna Black

    I don’t have a problem with it. Lego has been marketing to girls since the 1980s, but the natural Lego playstyle is builder-planner, focusing on architecture rather than communication-bonding, which is typical of doll play. I loved legos as a kid but I never TOUCHED the minifigs for exactly that reason: they’re impersonal. I played with other dolls, and I played with other kids, but as a little girl, Lego time was about me and bricks. I didn’t even talk to other kids while I played with Legos. Introducing the concept of avatar play within the Legoverse would be very appealing to girls for the same reason it’s not appealing to boys: because it’s about communication play. Rather than having Suzy get bored with impersonal Lego time and go play with Bratz, she now has a way to engage the mathematical, critical, problem-solving builder-brain within the context of a play style that appeals to her relater side which is, whether it’s PC or not, more prevalent in girls than boys.

    I have an issue with treating boys and girls like they have to be different to support gender stereotyping, but I also have an issue with telling girls and boys they HAVE to be the same and think the same and work the same and play the same even though their brains are not the same. Any gender can hook up with any thinking style, but there are patterns of correlation by sex. The girls that already have strong planner-builder thinking will be attracted to Lego with or without ladyfigs. The girls who have weaker planner-builder thinking will benefit from ladyfigs, because they’ll be drawn into a game which will build the thought processes that will allow critical thinking, problem solving, and support math. What we’re not talking about is that there are also boys who are more relater-oriented, who might also be more attracted to Lego in the context of a personal, communication-based play style.

    Nobody loses.

  • http://twitter.com/KateDrewThis Katharine Tapley

    Hmm. My daughter loves Legos, I loved Legos. I think these meant to appeal…not to girls in general…but girls who don’t already like Lego. I think they’re trying to cash in on the Polly Pocket market. Whatever. If someone buys them for my daughter, I won’t object, but she’s happy getting them out of the big, genderless bin she shares with her brother.

Previous post:

Next post: